Parables and the fate of our Society

It is an interesting Bible concept that each story is in fact a parable; each story has its own message. Even from the start, it says that the world was created in six days, but how did they measure the days when the creation of the sun and moon did not happen until the fourth day? That is surprisingly similar to the scientific view that the Earth has only existed for one third of the life of the universe; but the intent of the story is not obvious.

Adam and Eve is obviously a parable about disobeying the word of the Almighty and the story of Cain and Abel shows where covetousness leads. A later story which is ignored by many is the story of Jacob and Esau. The Almighty had promised Abraham and Isaac that their descendents would be a great multitude and would possess the land. Jacob was the younger, very industrious and desired this birthright, his older brother Esau was blasé about it and cared little. When Esau came in from hunting and feeling hungry he asked his younger brother, Jacob for a bowl of the lentil stew that he had made Jacob said, “Sell me your birthright.”

Esau sold his birthright for a bowl of pottage and of course the parable of this story is that we each have a birthright to treasure or deny. We each have a choice to accept the teachings of our forefathers or to sell out and become something else. We can choose to accept the Bible and the history of western culture or to sell out to a concept of “multiculturalism” and deny our heritage.

The Gates of Vienna website reported that, “In 2009 it was revealed that the ruling Labour Party had purposefully flooded Britain with millions of immigrants without consulting its citizens, in order to socially engineer a “truly Multicultural” country. The huge increases in migrants over the previous twelve years were due in part to a politically motivated attempt to radically change the country and to “rub the Right’s nose in diversity,” if you believe Andrew Neather, a former adviser to Prime Minister Tony Blair. He said that mass immigration was the result of a deliberate plan, but ministers were reluctant to discuss this openly for fear of alienating the party’s “core working class vote.”

A similar action appears to have been taken by the Australian Labour Party, who came to power at a time when only two boatloads of illegal immigrants had arrived in the previous twelve months. One of their first actions was to change the law and close offshore processing centres. The following week two boats arrived and the numbers have been increasing steadily ever since. When Julia Gillard ousted her predecessor and became Prime Minister on 24^th June, 2010 the number of illegal immigrants arriving by boat increased to 7,000 a year (according to APH Library - see graph) in over 160 boats.

This ongoing decimation of Western civilization can partly be explained as a denial of our history and culture among Western elites, who no longer feel attached to their own people but see them as obstacles to be overcome, or silenced through widespread anti-racism campaigns and doctrinal guilt imposed from above. Just like Esau we have sold our birthright, our heritage, for a bowl of pottage.

The phrase “Political Correctness” first came into use under Communism and meant that all ideas had to conform to and support the agenda of the Marxist movement. History and philosophy were the first to be forced into line, but as is clear from the career of Trofim Lysenko, science was also made to conform. Those who dissented from the official doctrine were judged to be psychologically imbalanced or evil. Today the ruling ideology is an absolute egalitarianism that if you analyse it closely actually amounts to saying that all cultures have an equal right to exist, except Western culture which is evil.

Professor Byron Roth said, “Whether Western elites really believe these things; is less important than the benefit they gain from its promulgation. The primary benefit is that it paralyses the popular preferences for national preservation by characterizing opposition to elite doctrines as immoral, indecent, and inhumane. It allows unelected elites to aggrandize their own power by obliterating national sovereignty and nullifying democratic accountability. Many are, without exaggeration, true totalitarians that have no regard for the well-being of those they control, since the only way they can consolidate their dystopian plans is through brute state power. While there is no doubt that many well-meaning individuals join their efforts, they are the sort of ‘useful idiots’ who excused and covered up Communist atrocities during most of the 20th century.”

We are fast approaching the time when decisions will need to be made as to whether we are among the ranks of the “useful idiots” who fall for the multicultural spin or whether we are prepared to stand up for our heritage.

Do not be the one who sells your birthright for a bowl of pottage.

Visit my website; for links to books, videos and much more!